Monday 30 March 2009

Secured Sustainable Development : Will the UK reach this goal?

Binge drinkers, lazy and laid back are phrases I have heard before describing people of the UK, focusing on the younger generation (16 – 30). The attitude of people in Britain today has become very individual, and there has been a decline in community spirit for many years. As the younger generation live life, having sex (more open relationships), drinking large amounts of alcohol and smoking cigarettes with the attitude, I only care about what affects me, I see sustainable development being hard to achieve.

The ageing population in Britain also presents another attitude towards sustainable development. The fairly new term and concept is something that the older generation lack enthusiasm due to lack of education.

“Sustainable development means a better quality of life now and for generations to come.” (Directgov, 2009) People in the UK are generally fairly happy, although, compared to 50 years ago, we are considered less happy! As people stay happy, and focus upon themselves, especially as the younger generation look to prosper in their careers, not much thought is given to the next generation and so on. Teaching and encouraging people, that sustainable development will reap major benefits, is hard, as the benefits are, hard to see, hard to measure and likely not to occur for a long time. Therefore people sometimes take the attitude; well there is nothing in it for me, so I will not bother.

Without council’s increasing the frequency and range of recycling that they will take, people are going to be less encouraged to do so. The wider variety of gods collected to be recycled, the more choice people will have to be aware and good citizens. The likelihood is that the lazy attitude many people present re-cycling with, is from a culture of having no time, and life moves at a very fast pass. But also, the separation of plastics and paper can be easy, but some people may find it confusing, especially as many councils have different lists to what they do and do not collect, the state the material must be in etc. This can easily confuse someone, especially when a council collect certain plastics and not others.

The government initiative to create sustainable communities currently has not changed many aspects of modern community life. “At the national level, the strategy sets out the framework for changing people’s lives through improvements in public services and providing opportunity for all.” (DEFRA, 2004) The goal the government has set, may indeed work, but with an attitude that they plan to change people’s lives, it is very hard to measure. There is no single thing that can occur and make everyone happy, although several differences could cause good effect. Many people are resistant to change, as it is purely something new and different, this resistance could hold up sustainable development or even securing sustainability altogether.

“The increasing stress we put on resources and environmental systems such as water, land and air cannot go on forever. Especially as the world's population continues to increase and we already see a world where over a billion people live on less than a dollar a day.” (DEFRA, 2008)

Sustainable development is never going to be something that is one day going to reach its equilibrium, as keeping an environment sustainable is a constant challenge for anyone. The goals that the UK government have to be a sustainable developed country maintaining that way of life is going to take years, even if in the decade of sustainable development by the UN, education is increased, time is going to play a huge role to the completion of the goals.

With the current economic climate, people are going to be losing jobs, homes, and mostly everything, as the depression really hits home. To an extent this may help the push on sustainability, but the likelihood that, goods such as fridges, freezers and even clothes will be recycled among households in communities, like in the last UK depression, but actually encouraging people to take a dive to live in a more sustainable manner may be hard.

The idea that is occurring, is sustainable development in the UK will progress, only when an attitude change with the population occurs. When people want to strive to, allow following generations to have just as many resources as ourselves. For my children’s sake, I hope that this earth will become a more sustainable environment, allowing people to see the wonders of the earth, and experience natural resources.


References
What is Sustainable Development
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Environmentandgreenerliving/Greenerlivingaquickguide/DG_069735
What is Sustainable Development
http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/what/index.htm
What is the government doing about Sustainable Development
http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/gov/index.htm
Sustainable Development Commission – Definitions
http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/definitions.html
Population Estimates
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=6
Are we happy?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/happiness_formula/4771908.stm
Securing the Future
http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/publications/uk-strategy/documents/ExecSum.pdf

Monday 9 March 2009

Am I apart of a SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY?

Home Address: Fareham, Hampshire, PO15 6JB
Ward: Fareham North-West
Super Output Area: Fareham 003E


Defining a sustainable community is not easy, as it encompasses as many aspects of sustainable development as possible, so the definitions could just keep on being written. Sustainable Communities in the East Midlands: Building for the Future’ (ODPM, 2003) state:
‘These communities should:
• Be economically prosperous;
• Have decent homes at a price people can afford;
• Safeguard the countryside;
• Enjoy a well-designed, accessible and pleasant living and working environment; and
• Be effectively and fairly governed with a strong sense of community.’
My home area is not a sustainable community, based on my own experience related to the ODPM, 2003. Firstly houses are not at an affordable price, there is little economical prosperous, the country side is being built upon and there is no sense of community.


The area I grew up, used to see all the children of the street playing together outside, and now, the younger children in the street aren’t even seen playing in their back gardens let alone together. Recently, a middle-aged neighbour died, this was a big shock, and upset many of us as she was a lovely woman. But, we all pulled together for the funeral, and that was it, I fear in a few years time, if someone dies it will just be like gossip.


House prices have just risen beyond belief. This is good, in the sense that my parents could get over double what they paid for the property, but they would not be able to afford somewhere just as big and with a big garden!


As much as I would like to see Fareham as a sustainable community, I doubt this will ever become realistic. Although my ward, is more likely to achieve being a sustainable community, as the area includes a couple of small villages.


Fareham North-West according statistical data, have affordable homes £165,314 (mean), but the reality of finding a nice house, in a good location with 3/4 bedrooms, you would be looking at £225,000 from experience when my parents considered moving. (see a.)


It is incredibly difficult to measure communities, community spirit. Therefore, there is no data relating to whether Fareham North-West is not a sustainable community, as on the website (see b.) , there were no indicators that determined the economic status etc as no figures were supplied.

Whereas Fareham 003E seeks well to be economically prosperous, as there is high employment levels in the super output area. This would indicate that the community could be more prosperous one, as employment has the possibility of expanding further. (see c.)


But Fareham003E is worse than my current residence in Northampton. (see d.)


This air quality is actually slightly worse than my current air quality whilst living in a hall which is, 1.09, rather than 1.25. (see e.)


I would hope that with development both the ward and super output area could become more sustainable, but this may take years, especially due to the economic recession currently.

References

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?sourceid=navclient&rlz=1T4ADBR_enGB293GB293&q=PO15%206JB&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wl

a.http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadKeyFigures.do?a=3&b=6096376&c=PO15+6JB&d=14&e=7&g=450560&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=0&s=1236634573533&enc=1

b.http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadAreaSearch.do?a=3&r=1&i=1001&m=0&s=1236631188743&enc=1&areaSearchText=PO15+6JB&areaSearchType=14&extendedList=false&searchAreas=Search

c.http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=3&b=307102&c=PO15+6JB&d=141&e=9&g=450560&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=0&s=1236634071130&enc=1&dsFamilyId=21

d.http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=3&b=307102&c=PO15+6JB&d=141&e=46&g=450560&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=0&s=1236634309395&enc=1&dsFamilyId=1066

e.http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=3&b=311600&c=NN2+7AL&d=141&e=10&g=473555&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=0&s=1236633764148&enc=1&dsFamilyId=1066